Co-constructing meaning within the family system: a longitudinal dyadic interpretative phenomenological study of adolescents with depression and non-suicidal self-injury and their primary caregivers

AI Summary

Adolescent depression with NSSI is co-constructed within families as a dynamic, temporal process shaping meanings, interactions and adaptation across illness stages.
A mid-phase quiet period marks a key divergence point: some families achieve tentative adjustment, others experience uncertainty, increased vigilance and persistent unworkable cycles.
Clinical care should address safety management and support family renegotiation of boundaries, signals and responses to foster lower-intensity, sustainable co-regulation under uncertainty.

BMC Psychol. 2026 May 23. doi: 10.1186/s40359-026-04757-2. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adolescent depression accompanied by non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is commonly recognized, addressed, and continuously reshaped within the family context. Existing studies predominantly focus on risk factors or caregiver burden, with limited attention to how family members jointly construct and renegotiate meanings of illness, self-injury, and safety over time. This study aimed to explore the interactional experiences of adolescents with depression and NSSI and their primary caregivers across illness stages, and to examine how psychological meanings and relational regulation processes are co-constructed within the family system.

METHODS: A longitudinal dyadic interpretative phenomenological analysis was conducted. Ten adolescent-caregiver dyads (N = 20) were interviewed during hospitalization (T1) and at 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) post-discharge, with optional joint interviews at T3-T4. Analyses followed an idiographic-to-dyadic and cross-temporal trajectory approach, attending to psychological convergence, divergence, and critical turning points across time.

RESULTS: A temporal trajectory of family meaning co-construction was identified. During hospitalization (T1), family interactions were often reorganized around risk containment, with NSSI-related distress commonly treated by caregivers as requiring immediate safety-oriented responses. In the post-discharge middle phase (T2-T3), some families entered a seemingly “quiet period,” which emerged as a key divergence point in dyadic adjustment. For some, reduced overt conflict functioned as a buffer that enabled tentative relational adjustments; for others, the same quietness was experienced as heightened uncertainty, which could intensify vigilance and avoidance and maintain less workable interactional cycles. By the later follow-up (T3-T4), several families negotiated lower-intensity yet sustainable interactional patterns through waiting, reduced reactivity, and shared safety cues, which, in some families, appeared to support a form of limited stability and more workable distress co-regulation.

CONCLUSIONS: Family experiences of adolescent depression with NSSI may be understood as a dynamic process of relational meaning-making and psychological adaptation. These findings should be read as interpretive and context-bound. They tentatively suggest that clinical work may benefit from attending not only to safety management, including suicide-risk assessment where clinically indicated, but also to how family members renegotiate boundaries, signals, and responses under ongoing uncertainty.

PMID:42174694 | DOI:10.1186/s40359-026-04757-2

Document this CPD