- Providers and leaders generally view video mental health care positively, often considering its quality comparable to in-person services.
- Attitudes toward phone care are mixed; concerns about loss of nonverbal cues contrast with recognition of phone increasing access for vulnerable veterans.
- Site-level variation and post-pandemic choice create inconsistent guidance; need clear information, resources, and decision support to ensure high-quality modality selection.
Psychol Serv. 2026 Jun 8. doi: 10.1037/ser0001049. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
This study examined mental health (MH) provider and leadership attitudes toward the use of video, phone, and in-person MH care within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Twenty-four semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted at six Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers between January and June 2024 (two high video use sites, two high phone sites, and two high in-person sites). Four interviews were conducted per site (three MH providers and one member of MH leadership). Interviews underwent rapid qualitative analysis informed by the Integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework. Attitudes toward video care were largely positive across respondents and sites, and most respondents felt the quality of video care was comparable to in-person. Beliefs about phone care varied substantially, with some citing the loss of important nonverbal information as a major deterrent to use, while others noted phone’s benefits in increasing access to care for vulnerable veterans. High video sites tended toward more negative views of phone care as opposed to the high phone and in-person sites. Site-level guidance varied regarding the permissibility of phone care. Findings describe a unique postpandemic period in care modality decision making in which there is an unprecedented amount of choice and variability in how MH services are delivered. It will be important to equip providers, patients, and leadership with comprehensive information regarding the relative benefits and drawbacks of each modality, as well as resources that can improve access to care, to help inform decision making and ensure provision of high-quality MH services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
PMID:42258253 | DOI:10.1037/ser0001049
AI Search
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

