Discrimination of a single-item scale to measure intention to have a COVID-19 vaccine
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0322503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322503. eCollection 2025.
ABSTRACT
AIM: When developing public health measures in a pandemic, it is important to examine attitudes and beliefs relating to vaccination uptake. We report the discrimination of a single-item vaccination intention scale and derive cutpoints in terms of sensitivity (true positives) and specificity (true negatives) in relation to subsequent vaccination status.
SUBJECT AND METHODS: In a sample of UK adults (n=1119) recruited through an online survey platform, vaccination intention was measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (0=very unlikely, 10=very likely) at the beginning of the UK COVID-19 vaccination rollout (January 2021), and self-reported vaccination status was gathered after vaccination had been offered to all adults (October 2021). Discrimination of the scale was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS: The responders reporting being vaccinated or unvaccinated were 1034 (92.4%) and 85 (7.6%), respectively. The area under the ROC curve was.956 (95% CI.943,.967), indicating a high degree of discrimination. The combined value of sensitivity and specificity was greatest at a cutpoint of 8 on the scale (sensitivity =.821, specificity =.988). If, however, the individual values of sensitivity and specificity are required to be simultaneously optimized, this occurs at point 6 (sensitivity =.886, specificity =.871).
CONCLUSION: We recommend a 0-10 intention scale as a validated, practical measure of vaccination intention in public health practice, with a cutpoint of 8 on the scale as optimal, unless sensitivity and specificity are to be simultaneously optimized, when 6 is the optimal cutpoint.
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 May 5;6(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00738-5.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Low-barrier HIV care is an evidence-based intervention to improve HIV outcomes among those who have complex barriers...
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 5;25(1):1652. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22684-6.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: School bullying has negative impacts on the overall health of children and adolescents, but the association between...
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 5;25(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07207-6.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Telehealth interventions have proven essential in maintaining healthcare delivery during the global pandemic. However, its broader adoption...
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 6;26(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01208-2.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) has transformed health policy and practice on death and dying. However, there...
BMC Womens Health. 2025 May 5;25(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03711-5.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) are commonly taken to increase muscle size and enhance performance. However, AAS can lead...
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 5;25(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07263-y.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: In nursing education, telenursing presents many challenges that contribute to psychological distress among nursing students. Understanding these...
