Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 18;16:1580657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1580657. eCollection 2025.
ABSTRACT
INTRO: The only legal option for Swedish patients who desire assisted dying (AD) is to travel to Switzerland. To access AD there, patients need medical certificates from their physicians. However, Swedish healthcare law and professional ethical guidelines lack clear directives on how physicians should handle such requests, which may place physicians in perceived ethical and professional dilemmas. How physicians reason about their professional involvement in writing such certificates has previously not been studied in a Swedish context. The aim of this study was to describe and explore physicians’ opinions and reasoning when confronted with requests for AD or requests to enable AD in Switzerland.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 12 semi-structured interviews with physicians from different specialties (oncology, neurology, palliative care, psychiatry, general practice, internal medicine) were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Participants felt it was important to address the reasons why patients wanted to pursue AD, including addressing fears, optimizing care, and existential aspects. Participants felt that they should write certificates to enable AD, citing different reasons. Simultaneously, many participants argued that performing AD in Sweden should not be part of their professional role. Some participants were more positively inclined but were still concerned with perceived obstacles.
CONCLUSION: Participants were concerned with the underlying reasons for patients pursuing AD, hoping to address them. Interestingly, although many of the participants expressed skepticism towards AD and its legalization in Sweden, they still supported writing a medical certificate enabling AD in Switzerland.
PMID:40606823 | PMC:PMC12213817 | DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1580657
AI-Assisted Evidence Search
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

