- Community violence interventions (CVI) are healing-centred, led by affected communities, addressing structural violence and racialised harm.
- Historic federal investment in CVI from 2021 to 2022 was reversed by rollbacks cancelling hundreds of millions, threatening programme sustainability.
- Policy choices reflect racialised ideology; antiracist evidence and collective action enabled CVI gains, yet political backlash reveals fragility of health equity reforms.
Am J Public Health. 2026 May 8:e1-e10. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2026.308458. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Community violence is a significant public health and safety problem in the United States that disproportionately affects Black and Brown communities. Community violence intervention (CVI)-a healing-centered approach implemented by and for those most affected by community and structural violence-received historic federal investment beginning in 2021. These investments are now under threat from the Trump administration, which canceled hundreds of millions of dollars supporting CVI. In this analytic essay, we (1) critically examine how racialized ideological frames underlying CVI differ from more traditional tough-on-crime approaches, using federal policy responses during the 1980s to 1990s and early 2020s as points of comparison; and (2) describe the efforts, events, and movements that contributed to unprecedented federal investment in CVI in 2021 to 2022. At a time of intensified governmental efforts to roll back antiracist policies and programs, we offer a timely, historically contextualized, and theoretically grounded analysis of how ideology, collective action, and research shape policy decisions of critical importance to population health and safety. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print May 8, 2026:e1-e10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308458).
PMID:42101169 | DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2026.308458
AI Search
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

