- Identify limitations in DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria for depressive disorders, emphasising need for improved diagnostic validity and clarity.
- Advocate a scientific, empirical approach to define key depressive disorders and to test dimensional versus sub-typing models.
- If sub-typing is supported, derive specific criteria for psychotic, melancholic, and residual non-melancholic subtypes with clearer clinical thresholds.
Australas Psychiatry. 2026 Jun 2:10398562261457027. doi: 10.1177/10398562261457027. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo note limitations to diagnostic criteria for the depressive disorders in the principal diagnostic psychiatric manuals (DSM-5 and ICD-11) and then detail how the key clinical depressive disorders might be defined by a scientific approach.ConclusionsSuch an approach should allow empirical resolution as to whether clinical depression is best modelled dimensionally or according to a sub-typing model. Presuming that the latter model is supported, such an approach would provide specific defining criteria for psychotic and melancholic sub-types – in addition to generating criteria for a residual and heterogeneous non-melancholic sub-type – and with a more definitive boundary between clinical and normative depression defined.
PMID:42231064 | DOI:10.1177/10398562261457027
AI Search
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

