- Three ACE profiles found; the high-risk subgroup exhibited highest depression scores and lowest subjective satisfaction.
- Felt depressed (CESD3) was the most central symptom; life dissatisfaction functioned as the principal bridge between depression and satisfaction.
- Higher ACE exposure strengthened connections between depressive symptoms and dissatisfaction, especially in the high-risk profile, supporting subgroup-specific interventions.
Aging Ment Health. 2026 Jun 28:1-14. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2026.2693235. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Although adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) impact long-term mental health, their role in the interplay between adult depressive symptoms and subjective satisfaction remains unclear. This study identified latent ACE profiles, examined network structures of depressive symptoms and satisfaction within each profile, and evaluated how ACEs moderate these associations.
METHOD: Using China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) data (N = 7881), latent profile analysis (LPA) identified childhood adversity profiles. Network, centrality, bridge, and moderated network analyses explored subgroup-specific symptom architectures.
RESULTS: Three distinct ACE profiles were identified. The high-risk group reported the highest depression and lowest satisfaction. CESD3 (Felt depressed) was highly central across profiles, and dissatisfaction with life served as the key bridge connecting the two domains. Moderated network analysis revealed that higher ACE levels strengthen links between depressive symptoms and dissatisfaction, especially in the high-risk group where symptoms and life evaluations were tightly integrated. For instance, positive connections were observed between SI1 (dissatisfaction with life) and CESD6 (felt fearful) (effect = 0.03), as well as between SI3 (dissatisfaction with marriage) and CESD9 (felt lonely) (effect = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Early-life adversity shapes enduring structural connections between adult depression and satisfaction, highlighting the critical need for subgroup-specific interventions.
PMID:42366693 | DOI:10.1080/13607863.2026.2693235
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

