Conflict Escalation in Intimate Relationships: An Event-Based Structural Model – Psychiatry AI: Real-Time AI Scoping Review

AI Summary

Event-specific appraisals predict negative emotional activation, especially anger, which increases escalation tendency and confrontational behavioural responses.
Fear activation is not associated with escalation tendency, indicating not all negative emotions carry the same escalation potential.
Findings stable across alternative behavioural models; women reported greater hurt, anger, escalation tendency, men greater compliance, suggesting anger-focused de-escalation targets.

AI Summary

This study advances an event-based structural model of conflict escalation in intimate relationships by examining how appraisal processes, negative emotional activation, escalation tendency, and behavioral responding cohere within standardized conflict events.

Appraisal components were positively associated with negative emotional activation, particularly anger, which in turn was linked to escalation tendency and to more confrontational behavioral indicators, whereas fear was not associated with escalation tendency.

By conceptualizing escalation as a structurally embedded response orientation within conflict events, the study clarifies how event-specific appraisal and emotion relate to both readiness and behavioral expression in intimate partner conflict and highlights anger-focused, rather than globally emotion-focused, targets for de-escalation efforts.

Basic summary

J Interpers Violence. 2026 Jul 17:8862605261463283. doi: 10.1177/08862605261463283. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Research on intimate partner violence has traditionally focused on discrete aggressive acts and their frequency, with less attention to how appraisal, emotion, and response readiness are organized within specific conflict episodes. This study advances an event-based structural model of conflict escalation in intimate relationships by examining how appraisal processes, negative emotional activation, escalation tendency, and behavioral responding cohere within standardized conflict events. Using a vignette-based survey of 2,702 adults in long-term intimate relationships, participants responded to scenarios involving potentially offensive partner demands. Path analyses tested associations among appraisal components, anger and fear activation, escalation tendency, behavioral responses, and expectations of partner escalation. To explicitly evaluate the robustness of the proposed structural configuration, behavioral responding was modeled in two alternative ways: as differentiated decision and response style components and as a unified ordinal severity index, with the full structural model estimated under both specifications. Appraisal components were positively associated with negative emotional activation, particularly anger, which in turn was linked to escalation tendency and to more confrontational behavioral indicators, whereas fear was not associated with escalation tendency. This differentiation between anger and fear indicates that not all negative emotional activation within conflict events carries the same escalation potential. The overall pattern of associations remained substantively consistent across both behavioral representations. Gender differences emerged in levels of several components, with women reporting higher perceived hurt, anger, and escalation tendency, and men reporting higher compliance. By conceptualizing escalation as a structurally embedded response orientation within conflict events, the study clarifies how event-specific appraisal and emotion relate to both readiness and behavioral expression in intimate partner conflict and highlights anger-focused, rather than globally emotion-focused, targets for de-escalation efforts.

PMID:42470106 | DOI:10.1177/08862605261463283

Document this CPD