Welcome to Psychiatryai.com: Latest Evidence - RAISR4D

Decomposing neuroanatomical heterogeneity in depression: insights from an ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group study in 5146 individuals

AI Summary
  • MDD shows greater global cortical thickness heterogeneity than controls (Cohen's d = -0.26), indicating increased neuroanatomical variability.
  • Regional variability concentrates in cingulate, insular, frontal and temporal cortices, with 5.7-6.8% higher thickness variation in these regions.
  • Heterogeneity is greater among patients on antidepressants (Cohen's d = -0.39); individuals with extreme variability show higher symptom severity, supporting stratification.
Summarise with AI (MRCPsych/FRANZCP)

Transl Psychiatry. 2026 Jun 23. doi: 10.1038/s41398-026-04189-x. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

The clinical and biological heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) may reflect the aggregation of different conditions with distinct pathologies under a single diagnostic label. Neuroanatomical heterogeneity in MDD was examined using a harmonized, age- and sex-matched sample from the ENIGMA MDD consortium (N = 5146; age range: 9-82 years; 64% female). Analyses of global neurostrucutral variability revealed greater cortical thickness heterogeneity in MDD compared with healthy controls (Cohen’s d = -0.26). Regionally, increased variability in cortical thickness was most prominent in the cingulate (+6.1 to +6.6% more variation in MDD) and insular (+5.8%) cortices, as well as in the frontal (+5.7 to +6.8%) and temporal (+6.1 to +6.8%) lobes. Heterogeneity in cortical thickness was more pronounced among patients using antidepressant medication (Cohen’s d = -0.39). Patient-specific analyses further showed that individuals with markedly increased cortical thickness variability (<5th percentile relative to the normative range) exhibited greater depressive symptom severity than those within the normative range (5th-95th percentile; Cohen’s d = 0.19-0.36). Overall, the results indicate that neuroanatomical heterogeneity in MDD is primarily expressed in cortical thickness, offering refined insights into the neurobiological complexity of structural alterations associated with depression. These findings could guide future stratification efforts examining whether regionally confined changes in cortical thickness within areas of pronounced variability reflect clinically meaningful patient subgroups.

PMID:42337246 | DOI:10.1038/s41398-026-04189-x

Document this CPD

Share Evidence Blueprint

QR Code

Search Google Scholar

Save as PDF

close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

Psychiatry AI: Real-Time AI Scoping Review