Development and reliability and validity testing of the college student ecological emotional intelligence scale

AI Summary

A 29-item scale with five dimensions: social-emotional regulation ability, ecological mindfulness, negative emotion insight, affective narrative ability, interpersonal emotional sensitivity.
Confirmatory factor analysis supported the five-factor model with good fit indices and Cronbach's alpha 0.953 indicating excellent internal consistency.
Scale demonstrated criterion validity, negative associations with psychiatric symptoms, positive association with resilience, measurement invariance across gender, and incremental validity.

AI Summary

Four independent samples were used: Sample 1 (N = 5,000) for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis; Sample 2 (N = 5,000) for confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-related validity, and reliability testing; Sample 3 (N = 18,084) for cross-sample validation and measurement invariance testing; and Sample 4 (N = 643) for incremental validity testing after controlling for traditional emotional intelligence.

RESULTS: (1) The final scale contains 29 items across five dimensions: social-emotional regulation ability, ecological mindfulness, negative emotion insight, affective narrative ability, and interpersonal emotional sensitivity. (2) Confirmatory factor analysis supported the five-factor model, with good fit indices (CFI = 0.938, TLI = 0.932, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.042). (3) Criterion-related validity analyses showed that total and dimensional scores were positively associated with psychological resilience and negatively associated with SCL-90 symptom factors. (4) Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis supported measurement invariance across gender. (5) The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.953, and all subscales met accepted reliability standards.

CONCLUSION: The College Student Ecological Emotional Intelligence Scale demonstrated sound reliability and validity and may serve as a useful instrument for assessing ecological emotional intelligence among Chinese university students.

Basic summary

Front Public Health. 2026 May 26;14:1807906. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1807906. eCollection 2026.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop the College Student Ecological Emotional Intelligence Scale and evaluate its reliability and validity.

METHODS: Drawing on the three-dimensional structure theory of emotional intelligence and ecological systems theory, we developed an initial 29-item scale through a literature review and expert interviews. Four independent samples were used: Sample 1 (N = 5,000) for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis; Sample 2 (N = 5,000) for confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-related validity, and reliability testing; Sample 3 (N = 18,084) for cross-sample validation and measurement invariance testing; and Sample 4 (N = 643) for incremental validity testing after controlling for traditional emotional intelligence.

RESULTS: (1) The final scale contains 29 items across five dimensions: social-emotional regulation ability, ecological mindfulness, negative emotion insight, affective narrative ability, and interpersonal emotional sensitivity. (2) Confirmatory factor analysis supported the five-factor model, with good fit indices (CFI = 0.938, TLI = 0.932, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.042). (3) Criterion-related validity analyses showed that total and dimensional scores were positively associated with psychological resilience and negatively associated with SCL-90 symptom factors. (4) Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis supported measurement invariance across gender. (5) The total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.953, and all subscales met accepted reliability standards.

PMID:42273636 | PMC:PMC13248623 | DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1807906

Document this CPD