Factors associated with depression among people with cancer: Systematic umbrella review
AI Summary
Depression in cancer is multifactorial, driven by interacting biological, psychological, social, sociodemographic, cancer-related and somatic factors.
Strong, consistent associations found for inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α, CRP), prior depression, distress and somatic symptoms such as fatigue and low functional status.
Prospective evidence remains limited; more longitudinal studies are needed for risk stratification, early diagnosis and improved patient management and communication.
Palliat Support Care. 2026 May 15;24:e146. doi: 10.1017/S1478951526102247.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Depression in cancer patients is a common condition that poses significant challenges for prognosis, treatment adherence, and quality of life. Its onset reflects the interplay of diverse biological, psychological, and social factors, which has been the focus of numerous studies.
METHODS: We identified both systematic and non-systematic reviews examining cross-sectional or prospective studies reporting associations between DAFs and depression. We extracted data relative to DAFs, as well as the direction and statistical significance of the reported association. Consistency of findings was assessed by estimating the proportion of concordant studies (PCS) for each DAF. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using a standardized tool.
RESULTS: We identified 73 reviews (26 systematic and/or meta-analyses, 47 narrative) encompassing 514 unique primary studies, reporting the associations between depression and 198 distinct DAFs. DAFs were grouped into six domains (sociodemographic, cancer-related, somatic, psychological, biological-genetic, and other). The strongest associations (PCS ≥ 75% and ≥5 studies) were observed for sociodemographic factors (e.g., high social support, being unmarried), inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α, CRP), psychological factors (e.g., history of depression, distress, anxiety), and somatic factors (e.g., fatigue, low functional status, malnutrition). When restricting analyses to prospective studies, consistent associations emerged for cancer-related physical symptoms and time dedicated to patient communication.
CONCLUSIONS: Depression in cancer is multifactorial, with physical and psychosocial factors likely iteracting dynamically. Prospective studies are still greatly needed. Further research on risk and protective factors may facilitate risk stratification, early diagnosis and patient management.
Turk J Emerg Med. 2026 Apr 3;26(2):87-93. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_381_25. eCollection 2026 Apr-Jun.ABSTRACTBlast injuries are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in modern conflicts and...
Psychol Med. 2026 May 15;56:e158. doi: 10.1017/S0033291726104516.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a one-year smoking cessation intervention for people with severe mental illness compared...
Psychother Res. 2026 May 15:1-17. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2026.2666624. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTNetwork Control Theory (NCT) is concerned with the control of dynamic complex systems, allowing the...
Curr Protoc. 2026 May;6(5):e70385. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.70385.ABSTRACTLearning and memory are essential for the acquisition, storage, and recall of information, enabling organisms to adapt to changes in...
Psychol Med. 2026 May 15;56:e155. doi: 10.1017/S0033291726103857.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Emotion dysregulation is a transdiagnostic construct associated with multiple mental health conditions and shown to be an amenable...
Chronobiol Int. 2026 May 15:1-7. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2026.2671355. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTMental health continues to be a growing concern among young adult college students. Prior research...
