- Forgiving and not forgiving function as ongoing sense-making processes for victims/survivors, not singular outcomes.
- Existing quantitative research frames forgiveness as an achieved event, overlooking victims/survivors' lived forgiveness experiences and not forgiving.
- Forgiving and not forgiving are socially available vocabularies that channel ongoing interpretation and meaning making in abuse recovery.
Violence Against Women. 2026 Jun 12:10778012261458794. doi: 10.1177/10778012261458794. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Most research into forgiveness in the contexts of domestic and sexual abuse involves quantitative studies of the benefits or risks of forgiveness for victims/survivors. This paradigm constructs forgiveness as an achieved event, largely overlooking victims/survivors’ forgiveness experiences. Furthermore, existing research scarcely addresses not forgiving among victims/survivors. This article shows both forgiving and not forgiving are utilized in processes of sense-making by victims/survivors. We argue that forgiving and not forgiving in this context should be understood not simply as an achieved event or specific form of experience, but rather as socially available vocabularies through which ongoing processes of sense-making are channeled.
PMID:42286879 | DOI:10.1177/10778012261458794
AI Search
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

