- Organ donation creates a counter-mimetic boundary-spanning dynamic, transforming injured bodies into sites of moral repair, promoting restraint, renunciation and shared vulnerability.
- Organ donation can act as boundary-making, seen as in-group betrayal or as reproducing asymmetrical power hierarchies during conflict.
- Using Girardian mimetic theory and ethnographic interviews, the study shows biomedical care simultaneously interrupts and reinforces cycles of wartime violence.
Soc Sci Med. 2026 Apr 29;401:119344. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119344. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
This paper develops a theoretical framework for understanding how wartime organ donation can both interrupt and reinforce cycles of mimetic violence. Drawing on René Girard’s mimetic theory, we analyze ethnographic and interview-based material collected between August 2021 and October 2022 from three cases of cross-community organ donation between Israeli Jews and Palestinians during armed conflict, examining how donor families and recipients frame bodily giving as an ethical, relational, and symbolic practice. The findings reveal a dual dynamic. Organ donation functions simultaneously as a boundary-spanning mechanism, introducing a counter-mimetic dynamic that challenges entrenched hostility by transforming the injured body into a site of moral repair and promoting restraint, renunciation, and recognition of shared vulnerability, and as a boundary-making mechanism, perceived as betrayal of the in-group or as reproducing existing power hierarchies. This contribution advances scholarship at the intersection of social science and health by demonstrating how medicalized exchanges of bodily material engage with political conflict and sacrificial logic, and suggests that acts of biomedical care can serve as mechanisms of both social interruption and social reinforcement during war.
PMID:42085798 | DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119344
AI Search
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

