- Pragmatic 18-month RCT economic evaluation of SMART4MD plus standard care versus standard care in Sweden and Spain, assessing costs and QALYs.
- Country-specific outcomes differed: Sweden showed higher costs and lower QALYs; Spain showed higher costs and higher QALYs for people with MCI.
- Intervention not cost-effective for Swedish informal caregivers, yielding an ICER of €78,000 per QALY; further research with longer follow-up recommended.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2026 May 22;13:e77808. doi: 10.2196/77808.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Support, Monitoring, and Reminder Technology for Mild Dementia (SMART4MD), a customized tablet app, was developed to improve or maintain the quality of life of people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their informal caregivers.
OBJECTIVE: This study conducts an 18-month economic evaluation of the SMART4MD app, in addition to standard care, compared with standard care alone in Sweden and Spain, from a health care provider perspective.
METHODS: In a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, people with MCI and their informal caregivers were randomized to the intervention and control groups. Health care costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured in 345 Swedish people with MCI and their informal caregivers, and in 347 Spanish people with MCI.
RESULTS: The analysis showed higher incremental costs and lower QALYs for Swedish people with MCI than for controls, whereas higher incremental costs and higher QALYs were observed for Spanish people with MCI. The intervention was not found to be cost-effective for Swedish informal caregivers, with an ICER of €78,000/QALY (€1=US $1.16).
CONCLUSIONS: The differing findings regarding cost-effectiveness for people with MCI in Sweden and Spain highlight the need for further research with extended follow-up, ideally involving a larger sample size and conducted across different national contexts.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03325699; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03325699.
PMID:42172614 | DOI:10.2196/77808
AI Search
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

