Welcome to Psychiatryai.com: Latest Evidence - RAISR4D

The Impact of Power and Disposition on the Evaluation of Sexual Assault

AI Summary
  • Social dominance orientation significantly predicts increased victim blame and decreased perpetrator blame in sexual assault evaluations.
  • Effects remained after controlling for sex assigned at birth, prior victimisation, and knowledge of others' victimisation.
  • Findings suggest applied implications for therapeutic interventions and system-level prevention to reduce victim blaming and improve responses.
Summarise with AI (MRCPsych/FRANZCP)

Violence Against Women. 2026 Jun 19:10778012261461599. doi: 10.1177/10778012261461599. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Rape myth acceptance has been connected to increased victim blaming and reduced perpetrator blame. However, variability exists in how scholars conceptualize relationships between rape myth stereotypes and assignment of victim and perpetrator blame. The current study sought to examine how social dominance orientation and personal and social power perceptions predict blame assignment in sexual assault scenarios among a community sample recruited from social media (N = 462). Social dominance orientation significantly predicted greater victim blame and lower perpetrator blame after controlling for sex assigned at birth, prior victimization, and knowledge of others’ victimization. Findings have applied implications for therapeutic interventions and system-level prevention.

PMID:42318684 | DOI:10.1177/10778012261461599

Document this CPD

Share Evidence Blueprint

QR Code

Search Google Scholar

Save as PDF

close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

Psychiatry AI: Real-Time AI Scoping Review