- Perfectionism, both positive and negative, is associated with increased career decision-making difficulties in college students, both directly and indirectly.
- The primary mediating mechanism is core self-evaluations, exhibiting a stronger indirect effect than psychological resilience for both perfectionism types.
- The chain pathway via core self-evaluations and psychological resilience exceeded resilience alone, but findings are correlational due to the cross-sectional design.
Front Psychol. 2026 Jun 9;17:1824328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1824328. eCollection 2026.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In recent years, career decision-making difficulties among college students have drawn increasing attention, significantly relating to their mental health and personal development.
METHOD: This study surveyed 1,000 college students through a convenience sampling procedure using an online questionnaire. A chain mediation model was developed and validated by using standardized scales to measure perfectionism, core self-evaluation, psychological resilience and career decision-making difficulty.
RESULT: The findings demonstrated that positive perfectionism is connected to career decision-making difficulties in college students through core self-evaluations and psychological resilience, and the indirect path through core self-evaluations was more prominent than the path through psychological resilience and the chain path through core self-evaluations and psychological resilience. Negative perfectionism also is associated with career decision-making difficulties through core self-evaluations and psychological resilience, with the indirect path through core self-evaluations again showing the strongest statistical association. In addition, the chain path through core self-evaluations and psychological resilience was stronger than the path through psychological resilience alone.
CONCLUSION: Overall, perfectionism may be associated with career decision-making difficulties in college students, both directly and indirectly, and it could be linked to these difficulties through its associations with core self-evaluations and psychological resilience. These results should be viewed as statistical correlations rather than causal evidence because of the cross-sectional approach.
PMID:42344980 | PMC:PMC13287068 | DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1824328
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

