- Sequential Cohort RCT uses sequential cohort enrolment with individual-level randomisation, accruing sample over time while standardising waitlist duration and intervention dosage.
- Designed for rural AI/AN communities, addresses staffing and recruitment constraints, ensures equitable access, and aligns with cultural and community preferences.
- Preserves a randomised comparison between immediate and delayed treatment conditions, offering a rigorous, culturally responsive alternative when traditional trials are impractical.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Jul 4:108389. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108389. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Health disparities facing American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations warrant effective behavioral health interventions that are grounded in culture and Indigenous worldviews, but AI/AN people remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Rigorous scientific methods are needed to determine the efficacy of new interventions, particularly in small rural communities with high treatment need and low access to care. However, many AI/AN communities prefer study designs that ensure all participants receive an intervention, and logistical constraints, such as small population sizes and limited staffing, can impede fully powered randomized controlled trials. This manuscript presents the Sequential Cohort Randomized Clinical Trial (SC-RCT), a study design developed through an academic-community partnership to test the efficacy of a behavioral intervention for substance use disorders in a rural AI reservation community. The SC-RCT differs from existing staggered rollout designs (e.g., stepped wedge, dynamic wait-listed) by using sequential cohort enrollment with individual-level randomization, allowing sample size to accrue over time while standardizing waitlist duration and intervention dosage across participants. This approach preserves a randomized comparison between immediate and delayed treatment conditions while accommodating staffing and recruitment constraints. The SC-RCT offers a feasible and culturally responsive option when traditional designs are not practical, and may be especially useful in small or under-resourced populations where equitable access and limited implementation capacity are key considerations. In AI/AN and other communities, this design may help overcome logistical barriers to research and support ethical and effective interventions in community settings. Clinicaltrials.gov ID number: NCT05612061.
PMID:42401232 | DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2026.108389
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

