Through the Lens of the Carers: A Qualitative Study on Barriers, Resources, and Opportunities for Improvement in Suicide Prevention in (Psycho-)Oncology
AI Summary
Structural and personal barriers, including resource scarcity, lack of knowledge, and difficult emotions, hinder proactive suicide prevention in oncology.
Workplace supports, clinician self-efficacy and skills, plus private life recovery, serve as key resources for managing suicidality in oncological care.
Improvement requires individual training and organisation-level changes such as standard operating procedures and shared responsibility to strengthen suicide prevention.
OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients are at increased risk for suicidal crises, making suicide prevention a pertinent issue for clinical practice. However, international research suggests that healthcare providers are anxious and, for example, do not actively inquire about suicidality. Such avoidance does not follow expert recommendations and puts patients at risk. First international investigations have reported diverse barriers standing in the way of the recommended clinical care. The present study aimed to expand this investigation to the German context.
METHODS: A preregistered qualitative study following a semi-structured interview guide was conducted with healthcare professionals (HCPs) (N = 20) working in the oncological setting. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis, following an explorative theory-generating approach.
RESULTS: The main result was a category system giving insight into both barriers and resources HCPs experienced concerning suicide prevention in their practice. Barriers comprised structural (e.g., scarcity of resources) and personal ones (e.g., lack of knowledge, difficult feelings). Resources were distinguished into work-related support, self-efficacy and skills, and private life/after work as an important equalizer. Along with the mentioned personal and structural dimensions, HCPs also highlighted possibilities for improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide an important basis for the development of needs-based solutions to strengthen suicide prevention in oncology. The study highlights that this can be achieved by both individual-level interventions (e.g., specific training) as well as organization-level changes (e.g., better implementation of standard operating procedures and shared responsibility). Addressing the reported shortcomings will support practitioners and improve clinical practice for patients.
Subst Use Addctn J. 2026 May 19:29767342261442453. doi: 10.1177/29767342261442453. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Substance use during pregnancy is a growing public health concern, yet little...
BMC Nephrol. 2026 May 19. doi: 10.1186/s12882-026-05061-2. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTCystinosis is a rare lysosomal storage disorder that affects approximately 1 in 100,000 to 200,000...
Surgery. 2026 May 19:110239. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2026.110239. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: We evaluated the fallout after closure of an urban level 1 trauma center using geospatial...
Australas Psychiatry. 2026 May 19:10398562261447698. doi: 10.1177/10398562261447698. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTBackgroundThe Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression - Inpatient Version (DASA-IV) is a brief violence risk...
Npj Ment Health Res. 2026 May 19. doi: 10.1038/s44184-026-00212-7. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTThe concept of Sabr (patient endurance) is central to Islamic spirituality yet remains...
Arch Sex Behav. 2026 May 19. doi: 10.1007/s10508-026-03443-z. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTPlurisexual women (i.e., women who are attracted to multiple genders) are at significantly higher...
