Who Gets the Guns? How Democratic Values and Security Threats Affect American Attitudes Toward Military Aid

AI Summary

Americans strongly prefer providing military aid to democracies that respect human rights, and this preference holds even amid terrorism threats.
Internationalist Americans become especially less likely to prioritise democratic values when terrorist threats exist.
The article shows democratic values shape aid preferences but face important limits; internationalist supporters are conflicted about prioritising democracy.

J Conflict Resolut. 2025 Oct 28;70(6):986-1017. doi: 10.1177/00220027251388634. eCollection 2026 Jul.

ABSTRACT

The United States gives substantial aid to the militaries of autocratic governments that abuse human rights. US officials claim this aid is necessary to manage security threats, but others argue the United States should prioritize aid for governments that reflect democratic values. How do these competing concerns shape Americans’ attitudes toward military aid? Through an experiment implemented on four surveys, I document a strong preference for aiding democracies that respect human rights, and this preference is robust to the presence of terrorism threats. However, internationalist Americans become especially less likely to prioritize democratic values when terrorist threats exist. Descriptive survey questions reinforce this pattern by showing how internationalists who support military aid the most are conflicted proponents of prioritizing democratic values in US foreign policy. The article extends research on attitudes toward foreign aid and illustrates an important limitation to the influence of democratic values on Americans’ foreign policy preferences.

PMID:42206187 | PMC:PMC13211145 | DOI:10.1177/00220027251388634

Document this CPD