Welcome to PsychiatryAI.com: [PubMed] - Psychiatry AI Latest

AI-generated text in otolaryngology publications: a comparative analysis before and after the release of ChatGPT

Evidence

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08834-3. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study delves into the broader implications of artificial intelligence (AI) text generation technologies, including large language models (LLMs) and chatbots, on the scientific literature of otolaryngology. By observing trends in AI-generated text within published otolaryngology studies, this investigation aims to contextualize the impact of AI-driven tools that are reshaping scientific writing and communication.

METHODS: Text from 143 original articles published in JAMA Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery was collected, representing periods before and after ChatGPT’s release in November 2022. The text from each article’s abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion were entered into ZeroGPT.com to estimate the percentage of AI-generated content. Statistical analyses, including T-Tests and Fligner-Killeen’s tests, were conducted using R.

RESULTS: A significant increase was observed in the mean percentage of AI-generated text post-ChatGPT release, especially in the abstract (from 34.36 to 46.53%, p = 0.004), introduction (from 32.43 to 45.08%, p = 0.010), and discussion sections (from 15.73 to 25.03%, p = 0.015). Publications of authors from non-English speaking countries demonstrated a higher percentage of AI-generated text.

CONCLUSION: This study found that the advent of ChatGPT has significantly impacted writing practices among researchers publishing in JAMA Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, raising concerns over the accuracy of AI-created content and potential misinformation risks. This manuscript highlights the evolving dynamics between AI technologies, scientific communication, and publication integrity, emphasizing the urgent need for continued research in this dynamic field. The findings also suggest an increasing reliance on AI tools like ChatGPT, raising questions about their broader implications for scientific publishing.

PMID:39014250 | DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08834-3

Document this CPD Copy URL Button

Google

Google Keep

LinkedIn Share Share on Linkedin

Estimated reading time: 5 minute(s)

Latest: Psychiatryai.com #RAISR4D Evidence

Cool Evidence: Engaging Young People and Students in Real-World Evidence

Real-Time Evidence Search [Psychiatry]

AI Research

AI-generated text in otolaryngology publications: a comparative analysis before and after the release of ChatGPT

Copy WordPress Title

🌐 90 Days

Evidence Blueprint

AI-generated text in otolaryngology publications: a comparative analysis before and after the release of ChatGPT

QR Code

☊ AI-Driven Related Evidence Nodes

(recent articles with at least 5 words in title)

More Evidence

AI-generated text in otolaryngology publications: a comparative analysis before and after the release of ChatGPT

🌐 365 Days

Floating Tab
close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

Psychiatry AI RAISR 4D System Psychiatry + Mental Health