- Professionals experience heterochrony: overlapping times (law, patient, family, bio-pharmacological, socio-historical) shaping aid in dying practice.
- Tensions arise between legal deadlines and applicants' temporalities, and between bio-pharmacological schedules and established professional logics.
- Managing heterochrony challenges the new role, but assembling and synchronising these times may enable harmonious implementation and better experiences.
Salud Colect. 2026 May 20;22:e5972. doi: 10.18294/sc.2026.5972.
ABSTRACT
Since its enactment, Organic Law 3/2021 on the Regulation of Euthanasia has altered the experience and professional practice of numerous individuals within the healthcare field in Spain. This impact is evident in how these professionals perceive the various temporalities involved in the process. Using the notion of heterochrony, this article captures this multi-temporality through an interpretive phenomenological analysis of 29 interviews and three focus groups with professionals involved in medical aid in dying. The professionals report a multiplicity of overlapping and interacting times: the time of the law, the patient’s time, family time, bio-pharmacological times, and socio-historical time. Tensions are highlighted between the deadlines set by the law and the times experienced by applicants, or between bio-pharmacological temporalities and prevailing professional logics. The article also assesses temporal spaces to support families and transition toward an emerging professional paradigm. Managing this heterochrony poses a challenge for this new role. However, the assembly, synchronization, and composition of the different times could facilitate a harmonious implementation of the law, improving the experience of all involved.
PMID:42191565 | DOI:10.18294/sc.2026.5972
AI Search
Share Evidence Blueprint

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF

