Impacts of Safe Streets, a community violence intervention, on youth violence in Baltimore City
AI Summary
Safe Streets linked to 42% fewer youth homicides and 21% fewer non-fatal shootings, but estimates lacked statistical significance; overall effects should be interpreted cautiously.
Site-level results varied: several sites reported large reductions, others showed increases; no site-specific estimate achieved statistical significance under primary inference.
Rarity of outcomes and modelling sensitivity suggest augmenting the Safe Streets programme, improve youth engagement, integrate with other prevention, support fidelity, invest in structural change.
Inj Prev. 2026 May 12:ip-2025-045716. doi: 10.1136/ip-2025-045716. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Violence interruption programmes are a common type of community violence intervention (CVI), but there is no empirical evidence on programme impacts on youth violence specifically. This study evaluates the effectiveness of Safe Streets, a violence interruption CVI programme in Baltimore, Maryland, in reducing homicides and non-fatal shootings (NFS) among youth ages 15-24.
METHODS: The synthetic control method was used to assess site level and programme level average treatment effects for 11 Safe Streets sites between 2007 and 2023. Models compared smoothed monthly rates of youth homicides and NFS in treated areas with their synthetic controls. Models were estimated using multiple inference approaches, treatment times and control pool eligibility definitions.
RESULTS: Safe Streets overall was associated with a 42% reduction in youth homicides and a 21% reduction in youth NFS, though neither estimate was statistically significant. Uncensored site-specific models estimate large reductions in youth homicides in five sites and youth NFS in seven sites and large increases in youth homicides in two sites and youth NFS in two sites. No site-specific estimates were statistically significant using primary inference methods.
DISCUSSION: The rarity of outcomes and sensitivity to modelling decisions warrants cautious interpretation of findings. Differences in programme effectiveness across sites suggest opportunities to strengthen youth engagement in some sites. Changing youth violence dynamics underscore a need to augment and adapt CVI models to match these cultural shifts. Continued work to integrate Safe Streets with other violence prevention approaches, support implementation fidelity and invest in structural change may improve programme outcomes further.
Haemophilia. 2026 May 13. doi: 10.1111/hae.70282. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTINTRODUCTION: Women with haemophilia can present manifestations and experience undiagnosed symptoms, which negatively affect their health-related...
Ann ICRP. 2026 May 13:1466453251412502. doi: 10.1177/01466453251412502. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTThe lower the dose, the 'safer' you are… but is that really the case in...
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2026 May 6;19:593459. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S593459. eCollection 2026.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: The onset and remission of probable depression may be influenced by shared modifiable factors;...
Indian J Community Med. 2026 Mar-Apr;51(2):405-409. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_99_23. Epub 2026 Feb 20.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: Effective integration of perinatal mental health care into primary care settings faces several...
Indian J Community Med. 2026 Mar-Apr;51(2):261-265. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_394_23. Epub 2026 Feb 20.ABSTRACTCONTEXT: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) refer to intensive and frequently occurring sources of stress...
Indian J Community Med. 2026 Mar-Apr;51(2):279-285. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_442_24. Epub 2025 Nov 20.ABSTRACTCONTEXT: Population aging is causing the rise in physical and mental illnesses, leading to...
