J Neurosci. 2024 Jun 27:e1195232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1195-23.2024. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Neocortex and striatum are topographically organized for sensory and motor functions. While sensory and motor areas are lateralized for touch and motor control, respectively, frontal areas are involved in decision making, where lateralization of function may be less important. This study contrasted the topographic precision of cell type-specific ipsilateral and contralateral cortical projections while varying the injection site location in transgenic mice of both sexes. While sensory cortical areas had strongly topographic outputs to ipsilateral cortex and striatum, they were weaker and not as topographically precise to contralateral targets. Motor cortex had somewhat stronger projections, but still relatively weak contralateral topography. In contrast, frontal cortical areas had high degrees of topographic similarity for both ipsilateral and contralateral projections to cortex and striatum. Corticothalamic organization is mainly ipsilateral, with weaker, more medial contralateral projections. Corticostriatal computations might integrate input outside closed basal ganglia loops using contralateral projections, enabling the two hemispheres to act as a unit to converge on one result in motor planning and decision making.Significance Statement Each cerebral hemisphere is responsible for sensation and movement of the opposite side of the body. Many axonal projections cross the midline to target contralateral areas. Crossed corticocortical, corticostriatal, and corticothalamic projections originate from much of neocortex, but how these projections vary across cortical regions and cell types is unknown. We quantify differences in the strength and targeting of ipsilateral and contralateral projections from frontal, motor, and somatosensory areas. The contralateral corticocortical and corticostriatal projections are proposed to play a larger role in frontal areas than in sensory or motor ones as a circuit basis for unifying computation across hemispheres in motor planning, while contralateral connectivity plays a smaller role in sensory and motor processing.

PMID:38937102 | DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1195-23.2024