Cartilage. 2024 May 10:19476035241247700. doi: 10.1177/19476035241247700. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of higher cumulative defined daily dose per year (cDDD/y) compared with lower cDDD/y of statin use in the incidence of any joint osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, patients who were aged ≥40 years were newly initiated on statin therapy between 2002 and 2011, and had a statin prescription for ≥90 days in the first year of treatment were identified from the 2000 Longitudinal Generation Tracking Database. All patients were separated into groups with higher cDDD/y (>120 cDDD/y) and lower cDDD/y (≤120 cDDD/y; as an active comparator) values. Propensity score matching was performed to balance potential confounders. All recruited patients were followed up for 8 years. Marginal Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate time-to-event outcomes of OA.

RESULTS: Compared with lower cDDD/y use, higher cDDD/y use did not reduce the risk of any joint OA (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.14). Dose-related analysis did not reveal any dose-dependent association. A series of sensitivity analyses showed similar results. Joint-specific analyses revealed that statin did not reduce the incidence of knee, hand, hip, and weight-bearing (knee or hip) OA.

CONCLUSIONS: Higher cDDD/y statin use did not reduce the risk of OA in this Taiwanese nationwide cohort study. The complexity of OA pathogenesis might contribute to the ineffectiveness of statin. Repurposing statin with its anti-inflammation properties might be ineffective for OA development, and balancing the catabolism and anabolism of cartilage might be a major strategy for OA prevention.

PMID:38726681 | DOI:10.1177/19476035241247700