Welcome to PsychiatryAI.com: [PubMed] - Psychiatry AI Latest

Exploring effective video-review strategies of patient encounters for medical students: precepted review versus peer discussion

Evidence

Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2392428. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2392428. Epub 2024 Aug 18.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Video-recordings review of patient encounters is reported to improve the clinical performance of medical students. However, evidence on specific remediation strategies or outcomes are lacking. We aimed to implement videorecording-based remediation of standardized patient encounters among medical students, combined with preceptor one-on-one feedback or peer group discussion, and evaluate the effectiveness of the two remediation methods using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).

METHODS: Following standardized patient encounters, 107 final-year medical students were divided into two groups based on different remediation methods of video review: (1) precepted video review with preceptor feedback (N = 55) and (2) private video review and subsequent peer group discussion under supervision (N = 52). All students underwent twelve-stations of OSCE both before and after the video review. Students’ pre- and post-remediation OSCE scores, self-efficacy level in patient encounters, and level of educational satisfaction with each method were assessed and compared between different video-based remediation methods to evaluate their respective effects.

RESULTS: After remediation, the total and subcomponent OSCE scores, such as history taking, physical examination, and patient – physician interaction (PPI), among all students increased significantly. Post-remediation OSCE scores showed no significant difference between two remediation methods (preceptor module, 79.6 ± 4.3 vs. peer module, 79.4 ± 3.8 in the total OSCE score). Students’ self-efficacy levels increased after remediation in both modules (both p-value <0.001), with no difference between the two modules. However, students’ satisfaction level was higher in the preceptor module than in the peer module (80.1 ± 17.7 vs. 59.2 ± 25.1, p-value <0.001). Among students with poor baseline OSCE performance, a prominent increase in PPI scores was observed in the preceptor-based module.

CONCLUSION: Video-based remediation of patient encounters, either through preceptor review with one-on-one feedback or through private review with peer discussion, was equally effective in improving the OSCE scores and self-efficacy levels of medical students. Underperforming students can benefit from precepted video reviews for building PPI.

PMID:39154381 | DOI:10.1080/10872981.2024.2392428

Document this CPD Copy URL Button

Google

Google Keep

LinkedIn Share Share on Linkedin

Estimated reading time: 6 minute(s)

Latest: Psychiatryai.com #RAISR4D Evidence

Cool Evidence: Engaging Young People and Students in Real-World Evidence

Real-Time Evidence Search [Psychiatry]

AI Research

Exploring effective video-review strategies of patient encounters for medical students: precepted review versus peer discussion

Copy WordPress Title

🌐 90 Days

Evidence Blueprint

Exploring effective video-review strategies of patient encounters for medical students: precepted review versus peer discussion

QR Code

☊ AI-Driven Related Evidence Nodes

(recent articles with at least 5 words in title)

More Evidence

Exploring effective video-review strategies of patient encounters for medical students: precepted review versus peer discussion

🌐 365 Days

Floating Tab
close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

Psychiatry AI RAISR 4D System Psychiatry + Mental Health