Evidence
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 May 8;46:e83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22002655.
ABSTRACT
To fully embrace situations of radical uncertainty, we argue that the theory should abandon the requirements that narratives, in general, must lead to affective evaluation, and that they have to explain (and potentially simulate) all or even the bulk of the current decisional context. Evidence from studies of incidental learning show that narrative schemata can bias decisions while remaining fragmentary, insufficient for prediction, and devoid of utility values.
PMID:37154132 | DOI:10.1017/S0140525X22002655
Estimated reading time: 2 minute(s)
Latest: Psychiatryai.com #RAISR4D Evidence
Cool Evidence: Engaging Young People and Students in Real-World Evidence
Real-Time Evidence Search [Psychiatry]
AI Research
Narratives need not end well; nor say it all
🌐 90 Days
AI Virtual Reality Related Evidence Matrix
Evidence Blueprint
Narratives need not end well; nor say it all
☊ AI-Driven Related Evidence Nodes
(recent articles with at least 5 words in title)
More Evidence
Narratives need not end well; nor say it all
🌐 365 Days
AI Virtual Reality Related Evidence Matrix
