Welcome to PsychiatryAI.com: [PubMed] - Psychiatry AI Latest

Psychopharmacology of eating disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Evidence

J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 30:S0165-0327(23)00833-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.068. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The concurrent assessment of weight and affective psychopathology outcomes relevant to the psychopharmacology of major eating disorders (EDs), namely anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED), warrants systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were inquired from inception through August 31st, 2022, for RCTs documenting any psychopharmacological intervention for EDs diagnosed according to validated criteria and reporting weight and psychopathology changes. Adopted keywords were: “anorexia nervosa,” “bulimia nervosa,” “binge eating disorder,” “antidepressant,” “antipsychotic,” and “mood stabilizer.” No language restriction applied.

RESULTS: 5122 records were identified, and 203 full-texts were reviewed. Sixty-two studies entered the qualitative synthesis (AN = 22, BN = 23, BED = 17), of which 22 entered the meta-analysis (AN = 9, BN = 10, BED = 3). Concerning BMI increase in AN, olanzapine outperformed placebo (Hedges’g = 0.283, 95%C·I. = 0.051-0.515, I2 = 0 %; p = .017), whereas fluoxetine failed (Hedges’g = 0.351, 95%C.I. = -0.248 to 0.95, I2 = 63.37 %; p = .251). Fluoxetine not significantly changed weight (Hedges’g = 0.147, 95%C.I. = -0.157-0.451, I2 = 0 %; p = .343), reducing binging (Hedges’g = 0.203, 95%C.I. = 0.007-0.399, I2 = 0 %; p = .042), and purging episodes (Hedges’g = 0.328, 95%C.I. = -0.061-0.717, I2 = 58.97 %; p = .099) in BN. Lisdexamfetamine reduced weight (Hedges’g = 0.259, 95%C.I. = 0.071-0.446, I2 = 0 %; p = .007) and binging (Hedges’g = 0.571, 95%C.I. = 0.282-0.860, I2 = 53.84 %; p < .001) in BED.

LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, short duration, and lack of reliable operational definitions affect most of the included sponsored RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of different drugs varies across different EDs, warranting additional primary studies recording broad psychopathological and cardiometabolic outcomes besides weight, especially against established psychotherapy interventions.

PMID:37393954 | DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.068

Document this CPD Copy URL Button

Google

Google Keep

LinkedIn Share Share on Linkedin

Estimated reading time: 5 minute(s)

Latest: Psychiatryai.com #RAISR4D Evidence

Cool Evidence: Engaging Young People and Students in Real-World Evidence

Real-Time Evidence Search [Psychiatry]

AI Research

Psychopharmacology of eating disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Copy WordPress Title

🌐 90 Days

Evidence Blueprint

Psychopharmacology of eating disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

QR Code

☊ AI-Driven Related Evidence Nodes

(recent articles with at least 5 words in title)

More Evidence

Psychopharmacology of eating disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

🌐 365 Days

Floating Tab
close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

Psychiatry AI RAISR 4D System Psychiatry + Mental Health