Tradeoffs in climate adaptation? Early data suggest reducing livelihood risks does not change health risks for mobile herders

AI Summary

Unprecedented drought harmed Rendille livelihoods; herders sold or slaughtered animals, shared food, and took on debt to maintain food security.
Herders extended treks by an average of seven days seeking pasture, altering traditional movement patterns as a livelihood adaptation.
Some distant-moving herders reported increased loneliness and stress, yet no clear differences in self-reported health between movers and stayers.

J Clim Chang Health. 2026 Jul 10;30:100707. doi: 10.1016/j.joclim.2026.100707. eCollection 2026 Jul-Aug.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Climate events like drought adversely affect the health and livelihoods of mobile or migrant communities. Individuals take various actions to reduce these risks – but how does climate adaptation in one domain, like livelihood, potentially increase risk in another, like health? How might actions to reduce health risks now, like by improving food security, increase health risks later, like to mental health?

METHODS: We present findings from individual surveys (n = 90) and in-depth interviews (n = 16) with Rendille people in northern Kenya that were conducted to understand the health impacts of and responses to hydroclimate extremes. Like many other mobile peoples, Rendille are on the climate frontlines.

RESULTS: During a recent unprecedented drought (2020-2023), Rendille employed a range of strategies to reduce livelihood impacts and improve food security, including selling and slaughtering animals, sharing food, and going into debt to buy food. Importantly, herders changed their movement patterns, trekking an average of 7 days farther than usual with their animals in search of pasture. Some herders who moved their animals reported that being so far away increased loneliness and stress; however, we found no clear differences in self-reported health effects between herders who stayed close to home vs herders who left.

CONCLUSION: Examining potential co-harms or tradeoffs between different adaptations – like reducing risks to livelihood at a cost to health – will help policymakers and stakeholders better evaluate actions to reduce climate-related risks, especially for mobile populations.

PMID:42471807 | PMC:PMC13380206 | DOI:10.1016/j.joclim.2026.100707

Document this CPD