Evidence
This addresses the application of small-n methodologies, mostly Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Process Tracing, in policy and programme evaluation. It will provide an overview of possible methodological options and suggest criteria for appropriate choice (e.g. evaluation questions) and combination of options. More specifically, it will address the benefits brought by QCA and Process Tracing, and their variants. as well as their challenges and limitations.
Barbara Befani has 20+ years of experience in developing, testing, and teaching evaluation methodologies. In the last 13 years she has focused on innovative methods for qualitative impact evaluation, between academia and the evaluation market, both domestic and international. She has been Secretary General of the European Evaluation Society.
Booking is required for people outside of the Department of Social Policy and Intervention (DSPI). The registration form will be available soon. DSPI members do not need to register
Add to Google Keep
Post to X
Share on Linkedin
Estimated reading time: 3 minute(s)
Latest: Psychiatryai.com #RAISR4D
Real-Time Evidence Search [Psychiatry]
AI Research [Andisearch.com]
Combining qualitative and small-n methodologies in impact evaluation designs: theoretical aspects and lessons from experience – Methods in Social Policy and Intervention Research
🌐 90 Days
VR Related Evidence Matrix
Evidence Blueprint
Combining qualitative and small-n methodologies in impact evaluation designs: theoretical aspects and lessons from experience – Methods in Social Policy and Intervention Research
☊ AI-Driven Related Evidence Nodes
(recent articles with at least 5 words in title)
Save Evidence Blueprint
Save as PDF
Combining qualitative and small-n methodologies in impact evaluation designs: theoretical aspects and lessons from experience – Methods in Social Policy and Intervention Research
🌐 365 Days
VR Related Evidence Matrix
