Welcome to PsychiatryAI.com: [PubMed] - Psychiatry AI Latest

Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Persian version of Peters et al. delusions inventory (PDI-40) in iranian non-clinical and clinical samples

Evidence

BMC Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;11(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01341-w.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Some individuals may manifest psychotic symptoms that do not fulfill the requisite clinical criteria for a formal diagnosis of psychosis. The assessment of susceptibility to delusions, encompassing both clinical and non-clinical cohorts, frequently makes use of the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI-40). This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI-40) in Iranian non-clinical and clinical samples.

METHODS: The present study employed a cross-sectional, correlational design in 2020. A total of 1402 Iranian participants were recruited for the study, which consisted of three distinct stages. The first stage involved an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) conducted on a non-clinical sample of 512 participants. The second stage comprising different non-clinical sample 764 participants to perform a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). In the third stage, a clinical sample of 126 psychotic patients was compared to a non-clinical sample. All participants completed the PDI-40, the Community Assessment of Psychotic Experiences (CAPE-42), and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The internal structure of PDI-40 was examined through the analysis of its factor structure using LISREL 8.8.

RESULTS: The EFA analysis unveiled nine components within Persian version of PDI-40. The CFA analysis demonstrated an excellent fit of the nine-factor structure of Persian PDI-40 to the data. The total score exhibited high internal reliability, as indicated by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.92. Moreover, Persian PDI-40 exhibited satisfactory evidence of convergent validity, as significant correlations were observed between dimensions of PDI-40 and subscales of CAPE-42 and DASS-21. Lastly, findings indicated that psychotic participants scored higher than non-clinical participants in all components of the PDI-40(p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Persian version of the PDI-40 demonstrates strong reliability and validity for assessing delusion proneness in both non-clinical and clinical samples in Iran. The observed distinctions between psychotic and non-clinical participants underscore its potential as a valuable tool for discerning delusion proneness in diverse contexts.

PMID:37759258 | DOI:10.1186/s40359-023-01341-w

Document this CPD Copy URL Button

Google

Google Keep Add to Google Keep

LinkedIn Share Share on Linkedin Share on Linkedin

Estimated reading time: 6 minute(s)

Latest: Psychiatryai.com #RAISR4D

Cool Evidence: Engaging Young People and Students in Real-World Evidence ☀️

Real-Time Evidence Search [Psychiatry]

AI Research [Andisearch.com]

Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Persian version of Peters et al. delusions inventory (PDI-40) in iranian non-clinical and clinical samples

Copy WordPress Title

🌐 90 Days

Evidence Blueprint

Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Persian version of Peters et al. delusions inventory (PDI-40) in iranian non-clinical and clinical samples

QR Code

☊ AI-Driven Related Evidence Nodes

(recent articles with at least 5 words in title)

More Evidence

Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Persian version of Peters et al. delusions inventory (PDI-40) in iranian non-clinical and clinical samples

🌐 365 Days

Floating Tab
close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.