- No significant differences in perceived readiness across virtual reality, traditional clinical, and face-to-face simulation (p > .05).
- Study used Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey 2.0 after a bipolar disorder virtual reality scenario with 22 students.
- Learners reported enhanced engagement, authenticity, and psychological safety in qualitative feedback, supporting virtual reality as an effective educational modality.
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2026 Nov 10. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001630. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Mental health nursing students have limited exposure to high-acuity psychiatric scenarios. This study compared learners’ perceived readiness across virtual reality simulation, traditional clinical, and face-to-face simulation training. Twenty-two students completed the Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey 2.0 following virtual reality simulation with a bipolar disorder client scenario. No significant differences emerged across six domains (p > .05). Learners perceived equivalent readiness for all modalities. Qualitative feedback highlighted enhanced engagement, authenticity, and psychological safety.
PMID:43006823 | DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001630
Share Evidence Blueprint
Save to Google Notes

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF
⭐ My Revision List

