Welcome to Psychiatryai.com: Latest Evidence - RAISR4D

Estimated reading time for CME/CPD: 2 mins

Comparison of psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the composite international diagnostic interview short form self-report (CIDI-SF-SR) in young adults

AI Summary
  • Standard PHQ-9 scoring yielded 44% prevalence versus 7% (2-week) and 13% (12-month) with CIDI-SF-SR, a sixfold increase.
  • Concordance between PHQ-9 and CIDI-SF-SR was approximately 60%; adding functional impairment increased concordance classification to 90%.
  • Comparative analysis identified an optimal PHQ-9 cut-off of 15 or greater when referenced to CIDI-SF-SR diagnostic criteria.
Summarise with AI (MRCPsych/FRANZCP)

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2026 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s00127-026-03132-1. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used self-report tool for screening depressive symptoms. However, several psychometric studies have raised concerns about its diagnostic accuracy. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form Self-Report (CIDI-SF-SR) is increasingly used in epidemiological surveys because it uses the diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). In this study, we aimed to compare the concordance between the PHQ-9 and CIDI-SF-SR to assess the presence of depression in young adults.

METHODS: Data were obtained from a national study on the mental health of midwifery students (n = 1,797). Participants completed both the PHQ-9 and the CIDI-SF-SR. While the PHQ-9 assessed the presence of symptoms over the past two weeks, the CIDI-SF-SR covered both the past two weeks and the past year.

RESULTS: The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 44% using the PHQ-9 (cut-off ≥ 10), compared to the 7% and 13% MDD prevalence with the CIDI-SF-SR for the past 2 weeks and 12 months, respectively. The concordance between the two scales was around 60%. Adding functional impairment to the standard PHQ-9 algorithm improved concordance classification to 90%. The optimal cut-off point, comparing PHQ-9 to CIDI-SF, was ≥ 15.

CONCLUSION: This study is the first to compare the PHQ-9 to the CIDI-SF-SR in a large sample of young adults. Compared to the CIDI-SF-SR, using the standard scoring of the PHQ-9 resulted in a 6-fold increase in the prevalence of depressive symptoms. This study could facilitate comparisons between studies using these two instruments and be useful for future meta-analysis.

PMID:42189186 | DOI:10.1007/s00127-026-03132-1

Document this CPD

Share Evidence Blueprint

QR Code

Save to Google Notes

Search Google Scholar

Save as PDF

⭐ My Revision List

close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

← →
RAISR4D CME/CPD Evidence Nodes
Swipe to navigate RAISR4D CME/CPD evidence nodes.
CME/CPD