Welcome to Psychiatryai.com: Latest Evidence - RAISR4D

Estimated reading time for CME/CPD: 2 mins

Effects of an Aesthetics-Based Educational Intervention on Compassion Competence and Aesthetic Care Quality Among Psychiatric Nurses: A Quasi-Experimental Study

AI Summary
  • Aesthetics-based educational programme significantly improved aesthetic nursing care scores in the intervention group compared with baseline and control (p < 0.001).
  • Compassion competence increased significantly after the intervention in the intervention group, with no significant change in the control group (p < 0.001).
  • Quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design with 90 psychiatric nurses randomised to four weekly 90-minute sessions or routine practice; outcomes measured by ENCS and CCS one month later.
Summarise with AI (MRCPsych/FRANZCP)

Nurs Open. 2026 Sep;13(9):e70854. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70854.

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an aesthetics-based educational intervention on compassion competence and aesthetic nursing care among psychiatric nurses.

DESIGN: A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study with a control group.

METHODS: The study was conducted at a psychiatric hospital in Kerman, Iran. A total of 90 eligible psychiatric nurses were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (n = 45) or a control group (n = 45). The intervention group participated in four weekly 90-min aesthetics-based nursing care educational sessions over four consecutive weeks, whereas the control group continued routine practice without receiving the educational intervention. Data were collected at baseline and 1 month after completion of the educational program using the Aesthetics of Nursing Care Scale (ENCS) and the Compassion Competence Scale (CCS). Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

RESULTS: Following the intervention, the mean total aesthetic nursing care score increased significantly in the intervention group compared with baseline and the control group (81.02 ± 6.26 vs. 43.26 ± 2.18, p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant change was observed in the control group (p = 0.11). Similarly, the mean total compassion competence score increased significantly in the intervention group after the intervention (60.73 ± 16.17) compared with baseline and the control group (p < 0.001), while no significant change was found in the control group (p = 0.12).

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution was involved in this study.

PMID:42758937 | DOI:10.1002/nop2.70854

Document this CPD

Share Evidence Blueprint

QR Code

Save to Google Notes

Search Google Scholar

Save as PDF

My Revision List

close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

← →
RAISR4D CME/CPD Evidence Nodes
Swipe to navigate RAISR4D CME/CPD evidence nodes.
CME/CPD