- Person-first versus generic-noun language produced a significant multivariate effect on combined implicit and explicit stigma measures among clinicians.
- Person-first language reduced explicit stigma on inclusions and prospects subscales compared with generic-noun language.
- Findings recommend language-based interventions and comprehensive, sustained strategies addressing both conscious and unconscious bias among mental health professionals.
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2026 Sep 10. doi: 10.1037/prj0000698. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This preliminary study explores how person-first language versus generic-noun language is related to both explicit and implicit stigma among mental health professionals.
METHODS: Sixty-five clinical psychology trainees and practicing clinicians were randomly assigned to read vignettes describing a person with schizophrenia using either person-first language or generic-noun language. Stigma was assessed via explicit and implicit measures.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of variance showed a statistically significant multivariate effect of label type on the combined dependent variables composed of implicit and explicit measures. Analyses of variance showed significant differences between the person-first language and generic-noun language groups on two explicit stigma subscales-inclusions and prospects.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These preliminary findings underscore the possible effects of language-based interventions and the need for more comprehensive, sustained strategies targeting both conscious and unconscious bias among mental health professionals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
PMID:42721320 | DOI:10.1037/prj0000698
Share Evidence Blueprint
Save to Google Notes
Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF
⭐ My Revision List
