- Co-designed, Behaviour Change Wheel-guided, pair-based 12-week programme was rated feasible, appropriate, and acceptable with attendance and adherence above prespecified benchmarks, no adverse events.
- Recruitment and onboarding were challenging: consent rate 29.3% and enrolment eligibility 33% fell below prespecified benchmarks.
- Objective SENS data showed reduced sedentary time and increased low-intensity activity mid-programme but returned to baseline by post-programme; most participants reported higher self-determined motivation.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2026 Sep 21:1-15. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2026.2733279. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a co-designed, Behavior Change Wheel-guided, pair-based physical activity (PA) program and explored preliminary changes in PA’s level and motivation. A single-arm trial with pre-, mid-, and post-intervention measurements was conducted. Autistic adults participated with a chosen partner in a 12-week PA program that supported self-determined activities, goals, schedules, self-monitoring, fortnightly check-ins, and regular facilitator support. Outcomes included intervention acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adherence, and adverse events, as well as study feasibility indicators including consent, eligibility, recruitment, retention, data completeness and analyzability rates. PA and sedentary behavior were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and a SENS accelerometer, and PA motivation was assessed using the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 (BREQ-3). Four dyads enrolled. Participants rated the program as feasible, appropriate, and acceptable. Attendance and adherence exceeded the prespecified benchmark of ≥70%, and no adverse events were reported. One pair opted out of all non-measurement components after Week 1. The consent rate (29.3%) and enrollment eligibility rate (33%) fell below prespecified benchmarks, whereas recruitment and retention were 100%. Measurement completion rates met the benchmark (≥80%) at every time point. Analyzable rates met benchmark for SENS, BREQ-3, and the post-program acceptability/appropriateness/feasibility questionnaire, but not IPAQ-SF. SENS data showed reduced sedentary time and increased low-intensity activity at mid-program, with both returning to baseline at post-program. Most autistic participants showed higher self-determined PA motivation post-program. The program appeared feasible, acceptable, and appropriate for participants, but recruitment and onboarding posed challenges.
PMID:42766792 | DOI:10.1080/02701367.2026.2733279
Share Evidence Blueprint
Save to Google Notes
Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF
⭐ My Revision List
