- Students support inclusion of men in GBV prevention as critical to transform harmful gender norms, but insist on structured safety and protection of women.
- Participants endorsed a multi-gender approach and community-driven, multi-sectoral interventions to strengthen prevention while centring survivor empowerment and accountability.
- Government-led campaigns viewed as ineffective, inconsistent, and inaccessible; civil society seen as more responsive, enforcement weaknesses and accountability gaps sustain GBV.
Front Sociol. 2026 Jul 10;11:1743220. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2026.1743220. eCollection 2026.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: South Africa has one of the highest rates of gender-based violence (GBV) globally, disproportionately affecting women, girls, and the elderly. Despite numerous intervention efforts, GBV persists as a major social and public health concern. Prevention campaigns are central to awareness-raising, behavioural change, survivor support, and justice advocacy. Lately, attention is being given to the inclusion of men in GBV prevention efforts.
AIM: To explored university students’ perceptions of GBV and the inclusion of men in GBV prevention campaigns.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the perceptions of university students regarding the inclusion of men in GBV prevention campaigns, to determine their understanding of GBV and the importance of GBV prevention campaigns and the role of multi-gender approach (MGA) in the GBV prevention campaigns.
METHODOLOGY: The study used a qualitative exploratory design guided by Social Learning Theory and Feminist Theory. Twelve third-year Psychology and Criminology students (7 females, 5 males), aged 22-29 years, were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Participants demonstrated a strong understanding of GBV and prevention campaigns, which shaped their perceptions of intervention strategies. Furthermore, participants supported the inclusion of men in GBV prevention campaigns and endorsed a multi-gender approach (MGA) as important in strengthening GBV prevention. However, inclusion was viewed as conditional, requiring careful structuring to ensure safety, trust, and the protection of women’s voices. Government-led campaigns were largely perceived as ineffective, inconsistent, and inaccessible, while civil society and community-based organisations were viewed as more responsive and impactful. Participants highlighted weak enforcement and limited accountability as key factors sustaining GBV.
CONCLUSION: Students recognised the importance of GBV prevention campaigns but questioned their effectiveness due to implementation gaps, limited reach, and institutional weaknesses. The inclusion of men was seen as critical for transfiguring harmful gender norms and strengthening prevention efforts. The results emphasise the need for inclusive, multi-sectoral, and community-driven approaches that balance male engagement with survivor-centred safety and empowerment.
PMID:42500593 | PMC:PMC13395704 | DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1743220
Share Evidence Blueprint
Save to Google Notes
Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF
⭐ My Revision List
