Welcome to Psychiatryai.com: Latest Evidence - RAISR4D

Estimated reading time for CME/CPD: 2 mins

Health Impact Assessment of proposed suicide prevention measures at Bridge A: A model for other high-risk locations

AI Summary
  • Health Impact Assessment effectively informed multi-agency suicide prevention decision-making and can serve as a model for other high-risk public locations.
  • Between Jan 2020 and Apr 2025 there were 20 suicide attempts and one death at Bridge A, predominantly women under 35, indicating high local impact.
  • Proposed structural modifications plus training and crisis support signage were judged to significantly reduce injury risk and improve road and route safety.
Summarise with AI (MRCPsych/FRANZCP)

Ir J Psychol Med. 2026 Jul 6:1-10. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2026.10209. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Suicide in public places remains a public health challenge. In Ireland, 512 suicides were recorded in 2021, almost one third in public places. Bridge A was identified as a high-risk site for suicide by jumping. This study aimed to apply Health Impact Assessment (HIA) methods to evaluate proposed structural suicide-prevention interventions and examine the utility of HIA in informing suicide prevention decision-making.

METHODS: A project-level HIA was conducted by the Health Service Executive National Health Improvement team, with multi-agency input, following Institute of Public Health guidance. The four stages – screening, scoping, analysis and reporting – were informed by a literature review, a site visit, population health profiling, and analysis of incident data from An Garda Síochána.

RESULTS: Between January 2020 and April 2025, there were 20 suicide attempts and one death at Bridge A, most involving women under 35, contrasting with national and international trends. Parts of the surrounding area showed higher levels of disadvantage, contributing to population ‘sensitivity’. The ‘magnitude’ of the health impact was assessed as high, and the intervention was judged to reduce ‘Injury risk’ and improve ‘Road or Route Safety’ in a way that is ‘significant’. The proposed structural modifications, alongside non-structural measures including suicide prevention training and crisis support signage, were recommended.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of HIA in informing multi-agency suicide prevention decision-making in public places. The findings support implementation of the proposed measures and highlight the potential for HIA to be applied to other high-risk locations.

PMID:42403054 | DOI:10.1017/ipm.2026.10209

Document this CPD

Share Evidence Blueprint

QR Code

Save to Google Notes

Search Google Scholar

Save as PDF

My Revision List

close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

← →
RAISR4D CME/CPD Evidence Nodes
Swipe to navigate RAISR4D CME/CPD evidence nodes.
CME/CPD