Implementing Prolonged Exposure Therapy in a Community Substance Use Treatment Program: A Qualitative Study

27/08/2026

AI Summary

INTRODUCTION: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with substance use disorders (SUD), yet few community-based SUD programs incorporate evidence-based trauma-focused.

Prolonged exposure (PE), including its massed format (M-PE) with session frequency of 3-4 times per week, is a gold standard intervention for PTSD; however, concerns about client readiness, logistical demands and relapse risk have limited its adoption within SUD settings.

RESULTS: Four overarching themes captured staff perspectives on integrating M-PE: (Theme 1) Prior Knowledge and Experiences: Most staff were familiar with EMDR, while direct knowledge of PE/M-PE was limited. (Theme 2) Perceptions of M-PE: M-PE was widely viewed as a promising, structured intervention that fits the pacing and duration of SUD care. (Theme 3) Symptom Reduction and Client Impact: Staff anticipated improvements in PTSD and SUD symptoms through trauma-focused treatment. (Theme 4) Barriers and Constraints: Participants identified several potential implementation challenges, including logistical barriers and client readiness.

Basic summary

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2026 Sep;45(6):e70239. doi: 10.1111/dar.70239.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) commonly co-occurs with substance use disorders (SUD), yet few community-based SUD programs incorporate evidence-based trauma-focused. Prolonged exposure (PE), including its massed format (M-PE) with session frequency of 3-4 times per week, is a gold standard intervention for PTSD; however, concerns about client readiness, logistical demands and relapse risk have limited its adoption within SUD settings. This study examined staff perspectives on the feasibility and acceptability of integrating M-PE into a community-based SUD program.

METHODS: Prior to launching a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial (Project COMET), we conducted semi-structured virtual interviews with 15 community clinic staff: providers (n = 8), administrators (n = 2) and peer specialists (n = 5). Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a rapid qualitative analysis framework with matrix techniques to compare themes across roles.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that staff generally viewed M-PE favourably but emphasised the importance of ensuring client readiness and organisational support. Enhancing feasibility and long-term sustainability may require expanded psychoeducation, targeted provider training and flexible delivery models.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06968832.

PMID:42648713 | DOI:10.1111/dar.70239

Document this CPD