- Higher emotional regulation capacity correlates with greater solitude capacity and relates negatively to loneliness (r = -0.269, P < 0.01).
- Solitude coping produces a suppressing effect between emotional regulation and loneliness, accounting for 22.54% of the direct effect.
- Solitude comfort mediates the link between emotional regulation and loneliness, with a mediating effect accounting for 20.81% of the direct effect.
Front Psychol. 2026 Jul 9;17:1842308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1842308. eCollection 2026.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Contemporary college students often experience significant loneliness. This study was aimed to explore the role of solitude capacity in the association between emotional regulation capacity and loneliness of college students.
METHODS: From June 10th to July 5th 2025, 814 college students were selected to participate in a questionnaire survey using Emotion Regulation Scale (ERSQ), the solitude capacity scale (SCS), and the UCLA Loneliness Scale. The suppressing effect and the mediating effects of solitude coping and solitude comfort between college students’ emotional regulation capacity and loneliness were tested.
RESULTS: The score of the emotional regulation capacity of university students was (69.65 ± 16.56), the score of solitude capacity was (55.92 ± 7.06), the score of solitude coping was (27.39 ± 4.04), the score of solitude comfort was (28.52 ± 3.87), and the score of loneliness was (40.43 ± 10.82). Emotional regulation capacity was significantly positively correlated with solitude and its two dimensions (P < 0.01), and significantly negatively correlated with loneliness (r = -0.269, P < 0.01). Solitude capacity and loneliness were not significantly correlated (r = 0.057, P> 0.05). However, solitude coping was significantly positively correlated with loneliness (r = 0.186, P < 0.01), and solitude comfort was significantly negatively correlated with loneliness (r = -0.090, P < 0.01). Solitude coping showed a suppressing effect between emotional regulation capacity and loneliness, with the suppressing effect accounting for 22.54% of the direct effect, while solitude comfort showed a mediating effect between emotional regulation capacity and loneliness, with the mediating effect accounting for 20.81% of the direct effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Solitude coping suppresses the relationship between emotional regulation capacity and loneliness, while solitude comfort mediates this relationship.
PMID:42495230 | PMC:PMC13391261 | DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1842308
Share Evidence Blueprint
Save to Google Notes
Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF
⭐ My Revision List
