Welcome to Psychiatryai.com: Latest Evidence - RAISR4D

Estimated reading time for CME/CPD: 1 min

Methods of Secondary Smile Salvation After a Failed Primary Salvation Procedure for Facial Nerve Palsy: A Systematic Review

AI Summary
  • Eight distinct secondary techniques reported across 4 studies (12 patients), all showing improvements in smile function, symmetry, or reduced House-Brackmann scores.
  • Evidence is limited by small sample size, methodological shortcomings and incomplete reporting, preventing identification of an optimal secondary technique.
  • High-quality, long-term randomised controlled trials with larger cohorts and comprehensive patient and outcome reporting are required to determine most effective secondary smile restoration.
Summarise with AI (MRCPsych/FRANZCP)

Ann Plast Surg. 2026 Jun 4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004776. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

The smile is a fundamental facial expression that is important for emotional wellbeing. Long-term facial nerve palsy leads to an inability to smile, which can have profound effects on mental health. Although numerous techniques exist for facial reanimation, evidence on secondary interventions following a failed primary procedure remains scarce. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, aimed to identify techniques for secondary smile restoration. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and MEDLINE identified 41 studies; after independent screening using PICOT-based inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a subsequent quality assessment, 4 studies (12 patients) were included. Eight distinct secondary techniques were reported, all of which were associated with improvement in smile-related outcomes and/or facial symmetry, alongside reduced House-Brackmann scores. However, these findings are limited by the small sample size, methodological shortcomings, and incomplete reporting, precluding an indication of the optimal technique. Future high-quality studies, particularly long-term randomised controlled trials with larger cohorts, and comprehensive reporting of patient characteristics and clinical outcomes, are required to establish the most effective method of secondary smile restoration.

PMID:42240406 | DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004776

Document this CPD

Share Evidence Blueprint

QR Code

Save to Google Notes

Search Google Scholar

Save as PDF

My Revision List

close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

← →
RAISR4D CME/CPD Evidence Nodes
Swipe to navigate RAISR4D CME/CPD evidence nodes.
CME/CPD