Welcome to Psychiatryai.com: Latest Evidence - RAISR4D

Estimated reading time for CME/CPD: 1 min

Now we see the violence inherent in the tinkering

AI Summary
  • Social tinkering offers a useful framework but is insufficient to account for human cultural complexity.
  • The hypothesis overemphasises cooperative interactions, neglecting conflict, violence, and inequality as drivers of cultural change.
  • Cultural outcomes depend on who can tinker and which artefacts are selected, shaped by power, coercion, and social hierarchy.
Summarise with AI (MRCPsych/FRANZCP)

Behav Brain Sci. 2026 Sep 18;49:e411. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X26106414.

ABSTRACT

The concept of social tinkering is useful, but insufficient to explain the evolution of human cultural complexity due to its overemphasis on cooperative interactions. The importance of conflict, violence, and inequality in the evolution of complex cultures complicates the social tinkering hypothesis. Who gets to tinker, and what determines which products of that tinkering are selected?

PMID:42757535 | DOI:10.1017/S0140525X26106414

Document this CPD

Share Evidence Blueprint

QR Code

Save to Google Notes

Search Google Scholar

Save as PDF

My Revision List

close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

← →
RAISR4D CME/CPD Evidence Nodes
Swipe to navigate RAISR4D CME/CPD evidence nodes.
CME/CPD