- Structured light post-meal activity significantly reduced likelihood of ritualised eating behaviours compared with enforced post-meal rest in inpatients.
- Within-subject counterbalanced crossover EMA in 33 inpatients over two weeks, 81% compliance, showed approximately 50% reduction in odds of ritualised behaviours.
- Supervised post-meal movement may interrupt ritual engagement during high-risk periods and EMA proves useful for examining behavioural mechanisms in inpatient care.
Int J Eat Disord. 2026 Jun 12. doi: 10.1002/eat.70137. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Mealtimes are associated with heightened distress among individuals with eating disorders (EDs) and are frequently accompanied by ritualized eating behaviors that maintain psychopathology. In inpatient settings, post-meal rest is commonly prescribed to prevent compensatory behaviors. Yet, enforced inactivity may exacerbate anxiety and ritual engagement. This study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine whether structured light post-meal activity is associated with a reduced likelihood of ritualized eating behaviors in an inpatient ED sample.
METHOD: Participants were 33 inpatients who completed a 2-week counterbalanced within-subject crossover protocol, consisting of 1 week of standard post-meal rest and 1 week allowing structured light post-meal activity. EMA prompts were delivered six times daily. Ritualized eating behaviors were assessed following reported eating episodes and coded dichotomously. A binomial generalized linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts for participants tested whether the likelihood of ritualized eating behaviors differed between conditions.
RESULTS: Participants completed 1503 EMA prompts (81.3% compliance). Across 1192 meal-related assessments, ritualized eating behaviors were reported in 30.8% of prompts during the rest condition and 24.2% during the post-meal activity condition, with substantial variability across individuals. Participants were significantly less likely to engage in ritualized eating behaviors during weeks allowing post-meal activity compared with rest-only weeks (B = -0.70, SE = 0.19, p = 0.0002), corresponding to an ~50% reduction in odds.
DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that supervised post-meal movement may help interrupt ritual engagement during a high-risk period and demonstrate the utility of EMA for examining behavioral mechanisms in inpatient care.
PMID:42286812 | DOI:10.1002/eat.70137
Share Evidence Blueprint
Save to Google Notes
Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF
⭐ My Revision List
