Welcome to Psychiatryai.com: Latest Evidence - RAISR4D

Estimated reading time for CME/CPD: 2 mins

School-level differences in self-harm and psychosocial problems associated with self-harm in adolescents

Summarise with AI (MRCPsych/FRANZCP)

Ir J Psychol Med. 2026 Apr 21:1-12. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2026.10192. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The school environment plays a key role in adolescents’ emotional development and well-being, yet little research has compared self-harm and related psychosocial problems across different secondary school types.

METHODS: Using data from the Growing Up in Ireland (GUI) longitudinal cohort, this study examined differences in the prevalence of self-harm and psychosocial risk factors across different school types: single-sex versus coeducational, fee-paying versus non-fee-paying, disadvantaged versus non-disadvantaged, and schools with different religious ethos. Multilevel regression models distinguished school-level from individual-level effects.

RESULTS: Almost all variance in self-harm and most of the variance in psychosocial problems associated with self-harm occurred at the individual level. Higher self-harm prevalence in single-sex girls’ schools was accounted for by the greater concentration of girls, who had over twice the odds of self-harm compared with boys (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.71-2.69). No significant differences in self-harm were found by school socio-economic status or religious ethos. Disadvantaged schools showed higher prevalence in seven of nine psychosocial problems, although only internalising problems and truancy/absenteeism remained significantly associated with disadvantaged schools in the fully adjusted models. Adolescents whose parents reported having a religion were less likely to self-harm (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.75).

DISCUSSION: Although schools are important settings for self-harm prevention, findings indicate that interventions should primarily target individuals and high-risk groups. Girls, in particular, may benefit from supports addressing self-harm. Disadvantaged schools, where well-established psychosocial risk factors for self-harm are more common, may benefit from well-being programmes targeting internalising problems and truancy/absenteeism.

PMID:42011664 | DOI:10.1017/ipm.2026.10192

Document this CPD

Share Evidence Blueprint

QR Code

Save to Google Notes

Search Google Scholar

Save as PDF

⭐ My Revision List

close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

← →
RAISR4D CME/CPD Evidence Nodes
Swipe to navigate RAISR4D CME/CPD evidence nodes.
CME/CPD