Testing the generalizability of couple communication typologies: A multisite replication and extension study

J Fam Psychol. 2026 Jan 19. doi: 10.1037/fam0001438. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Research on couple typologies has advanced our understanding of the communication patterns that distinguish happy from distressed partners. However, this work has suffered from a lack of conceptual and methodological cohesion and replication in large, heterogeneous samples, resulting in idiosyncratic typologies with limited generalizability beyond their initial development. The present study replicates and extends prior research by testing the external validity of previous communication typologies in a multisite sample of couples. We combined data from 13 studies that used the Rapid Marital Interaction Coding System to observe communication during mixed-gender couples’ 10-min conflict interactions (N = 1,957). We used latent profile analysis to examine men’s and women’s (a) positive, negative, and neutral behavior and (b) positive and negative reciprocity. Groups were compared on relationship satisfaction and intimate partner violence to further characterize differences among couple subtypes. A five-class solution revealed couples whose communication can be described as (a) task-oriented (low positivity/negativity, high neutral problem discussion; 53%), (b) warm (high positivity/low negativity; 24%), (c) hostile (low positivity/high negativity; 9%), (d) expressive (high positivity/negativity; 7%), and (e) warm-but-reactive (high positivity/low negativity, high negative reciprocity; 6%). Men and women reported the highest levels of satisfaction in the warm, task-oriented, and warm-but-reactive groups. Intimate partner violence was highest in the hostile and expressive groups. These outcomes are largely concordant with the previous findings and should increase the field’s confidence in the generalizability of earlier typologies. Our findings also raise new questions about the heterogeneous nature of communication among happy couples. We discuss these questions and their clinical implications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

PMID:41556926 | DOI:10.1037/fam0001438