The power of silence: a qualitative inquiry into silent consent and its psychosocial foundations

11/07/2026

AI Summary

Silence often reflects fear, shame, emotional exhaustion, avoidance and distrust, serving as self-protection rather than automatic approval.
Repeated individual silences, when normalized and institutionally ignored or exploited, can produce societal silent consent that legitimises and reproduces social deviance.
Distinguishing silence as behaviour from silent consent as social effect extends analysis beyond organisations to everyday relations, cultural expectations, and structural power.

TL;DR (AI Generated)

The study therefore develops the concept of societal silent consent as a collective process through which repeated individual silences in the face of perceived social deviance contribute to the normalization, legitimation, or reproduction of that deviance.

By distinguishing silence as behaviour from silent consent as a possible social effect, the study extends discussions of silence beyond organizational behaviour and situates them within everyday social relations, cultural expectations, and structural power.

Basic summary

BMC Psychol. 2026 Jul 10. doi: 10.1186/s40359-026-05159-0. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to understand why individuals remain silent in the face of social deviance phenomena such as injustice, discrimination, violence, corruption, and lawlessness in everyday life, and how repeated and normalized silence may contribute to the social production of consent. Using a qualitative focus group design, semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 30 participants from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds. The data were analysed through a codebook-oriented thematic analysis informed by Braun and Clarke’s six-phase approach. The analysis generated three main themes: Learned Silence, Learned Helplessness, and Avoidance. The findings show that silence should not be interpreted automatically as approval. In participants’ accounts, silence was often associated with fear, shame, emotional exhaustion, avoidance of harm, distrust of institutions, social exclusion, and self-protection. However, when individual silences are repeatedly observed, socially normalized, and institutionally ignored or exploited, they may contribute to the normalization and reproduction of the very deviance that individuals do not explicitly approve. The study therefore develops the concept of societal silent consent as a collective process through which repeated individual silences in the face of perceived social deviance contribute to the normalization, legitimation, or reproduction of that deviance. By distinguishing silence as behaviour from silent consent as a possible social effect, the study extends discussions of silence beyond organizational behaviour and situates them within everyday social relations, cultural expectations, and structural power.

PMID:42432746 | DOI:10.1186/s40359-026-05159-0

Document this CPD