- Consensus-based advanced reporting standards for paediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, video capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy were developed.
- A Delphi process with 34 paediatric endoscopy experts achieved consensus on 47 of 50 statements after up to two rounds.
- Approved recommendations provide a practical framework to improve report completeness, promote procedural standardisation, enhance multicentre comparability and support quality improvement.
Dig Liver Dis. 2026 Sep 12:S1590-8658(26)00935-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2026.08.035. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Standardized reporting is a key component of quality in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy, particularly for advanced procedures. However, reporting of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, video capsule endoscopy, and device-assisted enteroscopy remains heterogeneous, with limited pediatric-specific standardization. We aimed to develop consensus-based advanced reporting standards for these procedures.
METHODS: A Delphi consensus was conducted by the SIGENP Endoscopy Working Group, involving 34 pediatric endoscopy experts. Panelists rated structured statements using a 6-point Likert scale. Consensus required both a mean score ≥5.0 and ≥70% agreement. This companion manuscript presents the results for pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, video capsule endoscopy, and device-assisted enteroscopy reporting.
RESULTS: Fifty statements were evaluated across the three advanced topics, of which 47 achieved consensus after up to two Delphi rounds. Approved recommendations addressed procedure-specific descriptors, classifications, and technical reporting elements for pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, core reporting domains for pediatric video capsule endoscopy, and technical and procedural elements of device-assisted enteroscopy. Three statements were not retained.
CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide a practical consensus-based framework for advanced pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy reporting. Their implementation may improve report completeness, promote procedural standardization, enhance multicenter comparability, and support quality improvement across centers.
PMID:42731956 | DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2026.08.035
Share Evidence Blueprint
Save to Google Notes

Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF
⭐ My Revision List

