Unbound bilirubin-based management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: The Japanese experience and global adaptation

04/09/2026

AI Summary

Japan pioneered UB measurement and integrated it into the Kobe University criteria, guiding neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia management.
Morioka 2017 revision incorporates gestational age, corrected gestational age, UB thresholds, and staged treatment across prolonged neonatal courses.
UB centred management supports longitudinal bilirubin and albumin binding monitoring, may reduce phototherapy, but multicentre long term neurodevelopmental evidence is limited.

Semin Perinatol. 2026 Sep 4:152294. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2026.152294. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is common, but bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction (BIND) remains an important cause of preventable morbidity, particularly in preterm infants. Japan has developed a distinctive approach centered on unbound bilirubin (UB), the biologically active fraction. Nakamura and colleagues pioneered neonatal UB measurement in the 1970s and incorporated UB measurements into the Kobe University (Nakamura) criteria in 1991. With improved survival of extremely preterm infants, bilirubin encephalopathy was still observed despite modest total serum bilirubin (TSB) levels that persisted beyond the first postnatal week. These observations led Morioka to revise the criteria in 2017, incorporating gestational age (GA), corrected GA, UB levels, and staged treatment throughout the prolonged neonatal course. Clinical experience suggests that this approach may reduce phototherapy exposure without increasing UB levels or exchange transfusion, although multicenter evidence with long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes remains limited. The Japanese experience emphasizes longitudinal monitoring and bilirubin-albumin binding characteristics beyond TSB levels alone. Transcutaneous bilirubin, albumin, and bilirubin-albumin molar ratio may facilitate screening, while emerging fluorescence-based methods may improve UB accessibility. UB measurement should be viewed as a framework for individualized risk assessment, with principles adaptable to diverse populations and clinical settings.

PMID:42692937 | DOI:10.1016/j.semperi.2026.152294

Document this CPD