- Weekend discharge was not independently associated with post-transplant alcohol relapse after adjustment; shorter pre-transplant abstinence predicted relapse.
- Unadjusted three-year graft survival was lower after weekend discharge, but difference lost significance after adjustment; results do not prove equivalence.
- Protocolised discharge education and relapse surveillance may mitigate reduced weekend staffing; multicentre studies are needed to assess generalisability.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2026 Jul 20;61(5):agag060. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agag060.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To examine the association between weekend discharge and post-transplant alcohol relapse, graft survival, and acute rejection in liver transplant recipients with alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD).
METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of 362 adult ALD liver transplant recipients (2016-2023). Weekend discharge was compared with weekday discharge. The primary outcome was alcohol relapse, analyzed using competing-risks methods with death as a competing event; secondary outcomes were graft survival and acute cellular rejection (ACR).
RESULTS: Sixty one (16.9%) had weekend discharge. Weekend recipients were older (median 59 vs. 53 years; P = .01); other baseline characteristics were comparable. Three-year cumulative relapse incidence was 13.7% vs. 21.1% (P = .36). Weekend discharge was not independently associated with relapse (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.46-1.71; P = .72); shorter pre-transplant abstinence was the only independent predictor (adjusted HR 0.99/month; P = .03). Although unadjusted 3-year graft survival was lower in the weekend group (76.6% vs. 89.6%; P = .03), this difference was not retained after adjustment (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.80-2.83; P = .21). Unadjusted ACR incidence was comparable across all horizons (P ≥ .25).
CONCLUSIONS: Among ALD liver transplant recipients managed with standardized discharge education and protocolized relapse surveillance, weekend discharge was not independently associated with alcohol relapse or graft survival after adjustment, and unadjusted ACR incidence did not differ between discharge groups. However, both adjusted estimates remain compatible with clinically meaningful benefit or harm, and these findings therefore represent a failure to detect an association rather than evidence of equivalence. Protocolized discharge care may mitigate the impact of reduced weekend staffing, although discharge timing itself may simply exert little influence on these outcomes. Multicenter studies are needed to assess generalizability.
PMID:42709943 | DOI:10.1093/alcalc/agag060
Share Evidence Blueprint
Save to Google Notes
Search Google Scholar
Save as PDF
⭐ My Revision List
