Julie Ley: Prevention of future deaths report 

The conclusion of the inquest was the following narrative: 
Julie Ley was 71 years old. She had a substantial history of mental illness. In December 2024 Mrs Ley’s condition deteriorated and she became progressively more anxious and had  depressive symptoms. On several occasions Mrs Ley was admitted to hospital before being  discharged to different supportive environments. However on each occasion Mrs Ley’s  symptoms made it impossible for her to care for herself and she was readmitted to hospital.  On 16th January 2025 Mrs Ley was admitted to the Kentmere Ward at Westmorland General  Hospital. Mrs Ley’s condition worsened over time and she was detained under the Mental  Health Act 1983 from 7th April 2025.   

The care received by Mrs Ley on the Kentmere Ward was inadequate. From mid April 2025. Mrs Ley became increasingly withdrawn and unkempt. Insufficient support was provided to her. In May 2025 Mrs Ley stopped accepting medication, food or drink. Monitoring of Mrs  Ley’s nutrition was not undertaken with appropriate diligence and she was not referred for  treatment at a more appropriate hospital where IV therapy could be administered. The  powers available under the Mental Health Act to give treatment without Mrs Ley’s consent  were also not used.   

Mrs Ley’s physical condition deteriorated. Her risk of embolus was not properly monitored.  On 15th May 2025 Mrs Ley died, on the Kentmere Ward, as a result of a deep vein thrombi. Her death was confirmed at 15:42.   
Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust have accepted that there were failures in respect of Mrs Ley’s nutrition, physical health monitoring, and use of legal frameworks and  that Mrs Ley would not have died but for these failings.   

Mrs Ley’s death was contributed to by neglect, being the failure to monitor her nutrition, the  failure to transfer her to a hospital able to treat her worsening condition and the failure to use available powers to administer medication to her. 
  
The medical cause of Mrs Ley’s death was: 
Myocardial fibrosis and pulmonary thrombo-emboli due to deep vein thrombi

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 
(1) The consultant who was involved in performing CPR on Mrs Ley agreed that she had  been in bed at the time. When asked why he had not moved her to a solid surface he replied  that he had attended many advanced life support training sessions and had never been told  this was necessary. In their article “The impact of compliant surfaces on in-hospital chest  compressions: Effects of common mattresses and a backboard” in the journal Resucitation  (Vol 80, Issue 5, May 2009) the authors notes that carrying out CPR in a hospital bed may be 50% less effective. I am concerned that despite receiving training a senior clinician was  unaware of this and consider that it gives rise to a risk of future deaths. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the  timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.  You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the  release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.