Welcome to Psychiatryai.com: Latest Evidence - RAISR4D

Estimated reading time for CME/CPD: 2 mins

The Relationships Between Motivations and Different Forms of Online Trolling Among Early Adolescents: Gender Differences in Network Analysis

Summarise with AI (MRCPsych/FRANZCP)

J Interpers Violence. 2025 Aug 9:8862605251360035. doi: 10.1177/08862605251360035. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Online trolling is a behavior in which individuals deliberately and maliciously post messages to provoke arguments and conflicts. Previous studies have frequently overlooked the heterogeneity in online trolling motivations and gender differences. Moreover, many prior studies included participants who had not engaged in online trolling. This study employed network analysis to investigate the relationships between motivations and forms of online trolling, as well as gender differences, among early adolescents who engaged in online trolling. A total of 1,118 early adolescents (mean age = 12.19 ± 1.51 years) completed a set of validated questionnaires. The results showed that (a) in the full-sample network, revenge and rebutting for disagreement were strongly related to proactive (trolling initiated without any provocation from others) and reactive trolling (retaliatory responses to perceived provocation or external pressures); escaping from real life was strongly related to proactive and bystander trolling (just interested in observing trolling content, such as viewing, liking, or retweeting). Furthermore, we also identified unique predictors for each type of trolling: social manipulation was strongly related to proactive trolling; maintaining social justice was strongly related to reactive trolling; and experiencing thrill and self-entertainment were strongly related to bystander trolling. (b) Gender difference analyses revealed significant variations in the global network strength. Females exhibited significantly higher edge weights for rebutting for disagreement-revenge/reactive trolling/bystander trolling. Males exhibited significantly higher edge weights for rebutting for disagreement-social manipulation and maintaining social justice-bystander trolling. (c) The high bridge expected influence analysis identified gender-specific key nodes-revenge, experiencing thrill, and escaping from real life in the male network, and revenge and experiencing thrill in the female network. Through visualizing network associations and metrics, this study elucidates the relationships between online trolling motivations and their forms. The exploration of gender differences further provides a basis for understanding and mitigating early adolescents’ online trolling.

PMID:40782325 | DOI:10.1177/08862605251360035

Document this CPD

Share Evidence Blueprint

QR Code

Save to Google Notes

Search Google Scholar

Save as PDF

My Revision List

close chatgpt icon
ChatGPT

Enter your request.

Psychiatry AI: Real-Time AI Scoping Review
← →
RAISR4D CME/CPD Evidence Nodes
Swipe to navigate RAISR4D CME/CPD evidence nodes.
CME/CPD